The given relation has 4 candidate keys $AD, BD, ED, FD$
Prime attributes : $A, B, D, E, F$
Non-Prime attributes : $C, G, H$
Lets check for $BCNF$ first
The very first FD i.e. $CH \to G$ is a violation to BCNF.
$R$ is not in $BCNF$
Lets check for $3NF$
Again the very first FD $CH \to G$ is a violation to $3NF$, since $CH$ is not a super key and it determines a non prime attribute $G$
Transitive functional dependency : If $\alpha \to \beta$ and $\beta \to \gamma$ and $\beta \not\to \alpha$ and $\gamma \not\in \beta$ and $\gamma \not\in \alpha$, then we can say $\alpha \to \gamma$ transitively.
$AD \to CH$ and $CH \to G$, so one of the candidate keys $AD$ transitively determines a non-prime attribute $G$.
Lets check for $2NF$
Since the candidate key $BD$ determines all of the attributes of $R$ i.e. ${(BD)}^+ = R$, lets consider the third FD which is $B \to CFH$, let's take by RHS splitting $B \to CH$.
$BD \to CH$ is a violating partial dependency since $B$ fully determines $CH$. Hence 2NF is violated.
OMG, it's not even in 2NF.
So the given relation $R$ is in 1NF only.
Correct answer : $A$