223 views
0 0 votes

Question: Behavior of Natural Join with Common Attribute in Different Domains

Suppose there are two relations, R and S, and both have a common attribute named 'a'. However, the attribute 'a' belongs to different domains in the two relations (for example, R.a is an integer and S.a is a string, or R.a is a string and S.a is a date).

What will happen if I perform a natural join between R and S in this case?

  • Will the query throw an error due to the domain mismatch?

  • Or will it return an empty result set?

I came across information suggesting that comparisons between compatible types (like integers and strings) might not throw errors in SQL but could result in an empty set. In contrast, incompatible types (like strings and dates) might raise an error. Can someone clarify how this works, especially in the context of natural joins?

1 Answer

1 1 vote

Deeper Explanation:

1. Natural Join Basics:
A natural join automatically matches columns by name and implicitly adds an equality condition between them (e.g., R.a = S.a).

2. Domain/Type Requirements:
When SQL processes the join condition (R.a = S.a), it expects that the data types of R.a and S.a are either:

  • exactly the same
  • or compatible types that can be safely compared (based on type coercion rules of the database).

3. What Happens When Domains Differ?

Case

Example

Outcome

Strongly incompatible types

string vs. date, integer vs. date

Error (type mismatch)

Possibly compatible types

integer vs. string

Allowed in some systems, but usually no match (empty result)

Compatible types

integer vs. integer

Works normally

4. Why Errors Occur:

  • SQL engines need to compare values.
  • Comparing values of fundamentally different types (like "abc" and a timestamp) often doesn’t make sense, and SQL refuses to guess how to do it.
  • Examples:
    • PostgreSQL: strict will throw an error.
    • MySQL: more permissive might silently cast (e.g., string to 0 in numeric context), which can lead to odd behaviours.
    • SQL Server: somewhere in between sometimes allows implicit conversions, sometimes errors.

5. Typical SQL behaviour:

  • PostgreSQL: Natural join will throw an error if the common attribute has incompatible types.
  • MySQL: Might allow the natural join but produce an empty result set because implicit type conversion leads to no matches.
  • SQL Server: Depends might allow or throw an error.

 

Position:
Show:

Related questions

0 0 votes
0 0 answers
1.6k
1.6k views
aditi19 asked May 8, 2019
1,641 views
how to write the query for natural join on three relations in SQL using the NATURAL JOIN clause?
2 2 votes
1 1 answer
96
96 views
GO Classes asked Sep 14
96 views
Consider $\text{Postings(post, position, user, ptext)}$.Two aliases of this relation are used:$\text{P1 = Postings}$$\text{P2 = Postings}$Consider the query:SELECT count(...
1 1 vote
0 0 answers
1.2k
1.2k views
0 0 votes
1 1 answer
1.5k
1.5k views
Shamim Ahmed asked Jan 8, 2019
1,509 views
Suppose we have 2 tables R1(ABCD), R2(DE) . R1 has 500 entries whereas R2 has 1500 entries. Here D is a candidate key. If we join them using natural join. How many entire...