• retagged by
5,039 views

3 Answers

Best answer
13 13 votes

RAID levels comparison chart

    RAID 1 RAID 5 RAID 6  
Min number of disks   2 3 4  
Fault to­le­ran­ce   1 disk 1 disk 2 disks  
Disk space over­head   50% 1 disk 2 disks  
Read speed   Fast Slow,   
Write speed   Fair Slow,  Fair
Hard­ware cost   High (disks) High Very high

RAID levels 2, 3, and 4 are theoretically defined but not used in practice. so ans should be A

• selected by
1 1 vote
  • RAID 1 (Mirroring): Every block is written to two disks.
    → Read: Super fast, because you can read from either disk (sometimes even parallel).
    → Write: Just copy the same data to both disks. No parity, no calculation. So write is not slowed down.

  • RAID 3, 4, 5, 6: All of these use parity.
    → Every write requires extra steps: read old data + read old parity + calculate new parity + write new data + write new parity.
    → That’s why writes are slower.

So, the correct answer is RAID 1 ✅

Answer:
Position:
Show:

Related questions

8 8 votes
3 answers 3 answers
9.8k
9.8k views
go_editor asked Jun 10, 2016
9,808 views
Disk requests are received by a disk drive for cylinder 5, 25, 18, 3, 39, 8 and 35 in that order. A seek takes 5 msec per cylinder moved. How much seek time is needed to ...
61 61 votes
5 answers 5 answers
14.7k
14.7k views
Kathleen asked Sep 17, 2014
14,696 views
A program consists of two modules executed sequentially. Let $f_1(t)$ and $f_2(t)$ respectively denote the probability density functions of time taken to execute the two ...
11 11 votes
3 answers 3 answers
6.2k
6.2k views
go_editor asked Jun 10, 2016
6,226 views
Feedback queuesare very simple to implementdispatch tasks according to execution characteristicsare used to favour real time tasksrequire manual intervention to implement...
8 8 votes
2 answers 2 answers
9.0k
9.0k views
go_editor asked Jun 10, 2016
8,979 views
On a system using non-preemptive scheduling, processes with expected run times of 5, 18, 9 and 12 are in the ready queue. In what order should they be run to minimize wai...