1 1 vote Consider the relation $R(T,I,G,E,R,S)$ with $F=\{G\to ES,\ RT\to I,\ IR\to E\}$.It is decomposed into $R_1(T,E),$ $R_2(I,G),$ $R_3(I,E,R,S)$.What does the Chase Test conclude?Lossless, because $E$ occurs in both $R_1$ and $R_3$. Lossless, because $I$ occurs in both $R_2$ and $R_3$. Lossy, because the Chase reaches a fixed point without producing an all-distinguished row. This is not a valid decomposition because no attribute occurs in all three relations. Databases goclasses goclasses-da-dpp goclasses-da-dpp-day-275 goclasses-cs-dpp goclasses-cs-dpp-day-373 databases goclasses-databases-practice-questions decomposition chase-test + – GO Classes 82 views answer comment Share Follow Print 0 reply Please log in or register to add a comment.
1 1 vote Construct the initial Chase tableau.Using $t,i,g,e,r,s$ as the distinguished values:\[\begin{array}{|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|}\hline\text{Relation} & \text{T} & \text{I} & \text{G} & \text{E} & \text{R} & \text{S} \\\hline\text{R}_1 & t & i_1 & g_1 & e & r_1 & s_1 \\\hline\text{R}_2 & t_2 & i & g & e_2 & r_2 & s_2 \\\hline\text{R}_3 & t_3 & i & g_3 & e & r & s \\\hline\end{array}\]Now apply the FDs.For $G\to ES$, no two rows have the same $G$ value.For $RT\to I$, no two rows agree on both $R$ and $T$.For $IR\to E$, no two rows agree on both $I$ and $R$.Therefore, no Chase substitution can be made.The table has reached a fixed point.No row contains $t,i,g,e,r,s$ simultaneously.Therefore, the decomposition is lossy.Answer : C GO Classes answered Sep 16 GO Classes comment Share Follow 0 reply Please log in or register to add a comment.