The Gateway to Computer Science Excellence
First time here? Checkout the FAQ!
x
+2 votes
214 views

Assume that you have a semaphore associated with each item on a doubly linked list. 
Using No other synchronization primitive, What is the fewest number of semaphore that you must acquire for any operation (lookup, insert, delete) ?

asked in Operating System by Veteran (27.6k points)
edited by | 214 views
Have to tried to consider shared and exclusive locks on a DLL ?

I think 3 semaphores are sufficient as 4 pointers are modified in case of DLL.
Answer given is $1$.

Given Solution :

looks right !

They are not asking to prevent deadlock or starvation. I accounted these for this question as it is not given to do that.
Questions asks for min. semaphores such that given $3$ operations can be performed one at a time. right!
In a doubly linked list we have access to a node from $2$ sides. So, If we go from other side we can perform many together.
This is what i was thinking. suppose we are reading from a node 4 and other thread comes and deletes node 3 then, we have to modify 2 pointers . But that can be done, if question says that there is no possibilty of deadlock and multithreading is there .

Since, it is not concerned about these problems, why not lock the complete list.
When complete list in locked using one semaphore, then it may be the case that all operations are performed from the side that performs UP on semaphore.
Not many up operations, if we use mutex then only 1 at a time will take the control.

Please log in or register to answer this question.



Quick search syntax
tags tag:apple
author user:martin
title title:apple
content content:apple
exclude -tag:apple
force match +apple
views views:100
score score:10
answers answers:2
is accepted isaccepted:true
is closed isclosed:true

28,834 questions
36,688 answers
90,626 comments
34,641 users