372 views
3 votes
3 votes

$L= { <G>$ is a CFG & not ambiguous $}$ RE or not? We can have 2 TMs where $T_{yes}\subset T_{no}$ just by adding additional ambiguous productions to an existing non ambigous CFG. So it seems to me it is not RE, but given answer is RE. Where I am wrong? 

Please log in or register to answer this question.

Related questions

11 votes
11 votes
2 answers
2
sourav. asked Sep 9, 2017
4,534 views
My Question $\{\langle M \rangle \mid M$ is a TM and there exist an input whose length is less than 100, on which $M$ halts$\}$I have to check that it is Turing Recogniza...
2 votes
2 votes
0 answers
3
bts1jimin asked Jan 8, 2019
611 views
CONSIDER THE FLLOWING LANGUAGE L={<M>| M is a TM and L(M)=empty}Which of the following is true?a- Decidable RECB- Undecidable and REc-Undecidable and non REd- Decidable ...
2 votes
2 votes
2 answers
4
Sandeep Singh asked Dec 30, 2015
462 views
Follow(S) comes as {(, ). $ }So, do we count $ as terminal or not.Could anyone please tell me, $ should be considered as terminal or not ? Although I think, I should not...