1,542 views
1 1 vote
Eric throws two dice, and his score is the sum of the values shown.  Sandra throws one die, and her score is the square of the value shown.  What is the probability that Sandra’s score will be strictly higher than Eric’s score?

a.  137/216

b.  17/36

c.  173/216

d.  5/6

2 Answers

2 2 votes

All possible combination= 6*6*6 = 216

If Sandra's dice=1 => her score=1 ==>no winning case

If Sandra's dice=2 => her score=4 ==> wins if Eric dice= (1,1) (1,2) (2,1) ==>3 ways

If Sandra's dice=3 => her score=6 ==> wins if Eric dice= (1,1)..(1,6);(2,1)..(2,6);(3,1)..(3,5);(4,1)..(4,4);(5,1)..(5,3);(6,1)..(6,2)

==>(6+6+5+4+3+2)=26 ways

If Sandra's dice=4 or 5 or 6 => her score=16 or 25 or 36 >12(max Eric's score) ==> 36+36+36=108 ways

thus, total winning cases for Sandra= (3+26+108) =137 ways

thus,  probability that Sandra’s score will be strictly higher than Eric’s score = 137/216

0 0 votes

Sorry for that i read question wrongly ( sandra also throws 2 dices )... But for my satisfaction i keep it as it is

DICE = {1,2,3,4,5,6}

Sum possible with rolling Two dices = {2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12}

favorable cases for

SUM = 2 ------ { (1,1) } =====> $\frac{1}{36}$

SUM = 3 ------ { (1,2),(2,1) } =====> $\frac{2}{36}$

SUM = 4 ------ { (1,3),(2,2),(3,1) } =====> $\frac{3}{36}$

SUM = 5 ------ { (1,4),(2,3),(3,2),(4,1) } =====> $\frac{4}{36}$

SUM = 6 ------ { (1,5),(2,4),(3,3),(4,2),(5,1) } =====> $\frac{5}{36}$

SUM = 7 ------ { (1,6),(2,5),(3,4),(4,3),(5,2),(6,1) } =====> $\frac{6}{36}$

SUM = 8 ------ { (2,6),(3,5),(4,4),(5,3),(6,2) } =====> $\frac{5}{36}$

SUM = 9 ------ { (3,6),(4,5),(5,4),(6,3) } =====> $\frac{4}{36}$

SUM = 10 ------ { (4,6),(5,5),(6,4) } =====> $\frac{3}{36}$

SUM = 11 ------ { (5,6),(6,5) } =====> $\frac{2}{36}$

SUM = 12 ------ { (6,6) } =====> $\frac{1}{36}$

 

Eric Sum would be {2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12}

when Eric Sum=2, Sandra's Sum should be grater than 2

when Eric Sum=3, Sandra's Sum should be grater than 3 and etc..

 

Required Probability

= { ( Eric=2 and Sandra >2 ) + ( Eric=3 and Sandra >3 ) + ( Eric=4 and Sandra >4 ) + ...... + ( Eric=12 and Sandra >12 ) }

= $ ( \frac{1}{36}  * \frac{35}{36} )+ ( \frac{2}{36}  * \frac{33}{36} )+ ( \frac{3}{36}  * \frac{30}{36} )+ ( \frac{4}{36}  * \frac{26}{36} )+ ( \frac{5}{36}  * \frac{21}{36} )+ ( \frac{6}{36}  * \frac{15}{36} )+ ( \frac{5}{36}  * \frac{10}{36} )+ ( \frac{4}{36}  * \frac{6}{36} )+ ( \frac{3}{36}  * \frac{3}{36} )+ ( \frac{2}{36}  * \frac{1}{36} )+ ( \frac{1}{36}  * \frac{0}{36} ) $

= $ \frac{1}{36^2} $ . {(35*1)+(33*2)+(30*3)+(26*4)+(21*5)+(15*6)+(10*5)+(6*4)+(3*3)+(2*1)+(1*0)}

= $ \frac{1}{1296} $ . {(35)+(66)+(90)+(104)+(105)+(90)+(50)+(24)+(9)+(2)+(0)}

= $ \frac{1}{1296} $ . {(575)}

= $ \frac{575}{1296} $ 

 

edited by
Position:
Show:

Related questions

0 0 votes
1 1 answer
1.8k
1.8k views
Raj Kumar 7 asked Jul 19, 2018
1,834 views
The number of integer n between 100 < n <300 such that 16 divides (n^2-n-2) and 25 divides (n^2+2*n-3).
0 0 votes
1 1 answer
1.7k
1.7k views
Raj Kumar 7 asked Jul 13, 2018
1,708 views
Q. Two consecutive numbers are removed from the progression 1, 2, 3, ...n. The arithmetic mean of the remaining numbers is 26 1/4. The value of n isa. 60 ...
0 0 votes
1 1 answer
126
126 views
Dhruv_Jangid asked Jun 2
126 views
For universal quantifiers we use implication, A - B(All A's are B's).for this it's true.But in this case it's also being true for A being false.Then how is this true ??...
0 0 votes
1 1 answer
229
229 views
saket jaiswal asked Apr 26, 2025
229 views
atleast x : >=xatmost x : <=x~(>= 5) equivalent <5 or <=6~(<=5) equivalent 5 or >=6CAN WE WRITE LIKE THIS IS THIS MATHEMATICALLY CORRECT :atleast x = total -...