ER- no of tables?
isn't R1 is m:n relationship as well which needs an another table? @Abhisek Tiwari 4
@balchandar reddy san @Abhisek Tiwari 4
thanks @adarsh_1997 for pic. i was not sure about these rep and treated R2 as many to many.
i think u must be sure about correctness of this snap?
I think it can be minimized ---- > 2 table
According to their site