retagged by
876 views

2 Answers

2 2 votes
Q.in = f(A.s)  // Q gets its value from parent i.e. L attributed

R.in = f(Q.s) // R gets its value from the Left sibling i.e. L attributed

Both are L attributed but NOT S-attributed.

Option (A) is correct.
edited by
Position:
Show:

Related questions

0 0 votes
1 1 answer
2.7k
2.7k views
radha gogia asked May 6, 2018
2,727 views
E->TE'E'->*T { printf('*') ;} E' | epsilonT- id {printf (id.name) ;}A) E->E*T | T {printf('*');}T->id {printf(id.name);}B) E->TE'E'->*TME' | epsilonM->epsilon { printf('...
4 4 votes
2 answers 2 answers
5.2k
5.2k views
Purple asked Jan 27, 2016
5,162 views
How to solve this question?Attributes calculated from children are synthesized, while attributes calculated from parents and/or siblings is inherited. And S-attributed ar...
0 0 votes
2 2 answers
1.6k
1.6k views
jaswanth431 asked Nov 16, 2021
1,585 views
If the grammar has only S-attributed semantic definitions, in a top down parser we will add the semantic action at the end of production and it will we executed when we...
0 0 votes
1 1 answer
1.8k
1.8k views
Na462 asked Oct 8, 2018
1,759 views
I know that every S attributed grammar is L attributed but not vice versa. Can anybody give example of the case if i print the semantic rules using L attributed the resul...