13 votes 13 votes All hill-stations have a lake. Ooty has two lakes. Which of the statement(s) below is/are logically valid and can be inferred from the above sentences? Ooty is not a hill-station. No hill-station can have more than one lake. (i) only. (ii) only. Both (i) and (ii) Neither (i) nor (ii) Analytical Aptitude gatecse-2016-set2 analytical-aptitude easy statements-follow + – Akash Kanase asked Feb 12, 2016 • edited Mar 7, 2016 by makhdoom ghaya Akash Kanase 4.3k views answer comment Share Follow See 1 comment See all 1 1 comment reply Kiyoshi commented Nov 17, 2021 reply Follow Share All hill-stations have only one lake. Ooty has two lakes. Then option C is correct. 1 votes 1 votes Please log in or register to add a comment.
Best answer 27 votes 27 votes All hill stations have a lake $\Rightarrow \forall x( h(x)\to (\exists y, l(y) \wedge has(x,y)))$ Ooty has two lakes $\Rightarrow \exists x ( o(x) \wedge \exists y,z ( has(x,y,z)\wedge l(y)\wedge l(z)\wedge (z\neq y) )$ Here, $h(x) \to x \text{ is hill station}$ $l(x) \to x \text{ is lake }$ $has(x,y)\to x \text{ has }y$ $has(x,y,z)\to x\text{ has } y, z$ $o(x)\to x \text{ is Ooty}$ Ooty is not a hill station: We can not derive this above arguments, Ooty has two lakes already, if Ooty had $0$ lakes only then this can become true. No hill station can have more than one lake. All arguments here are saying are if we have hill station, it can have lake. It is nowhere told that how many lakes it has. So, this is false. Answer: (D) neither (i) nor (ii) Akash Kanase answered Feb 12, 2016 • edited Jan 13, 2023 by shadymademe Akash Kanase comment Share Follow See all 2 Comments See all 2 2 Comments reply bhuv commented Jan 19, 2018 reply Follow Share Also, there could exist some places which have lakes but those place might not be a hill station. $(could\ be\ True \ or\ false)?\rightarrow Has\ a\ lake(give\ as\ true ) \\ don't\ goes\ backward\leftarrow True$ only false goes backward. so we can't say if a place has "two lakes"(basically "having a lake" condition is true) is a hill station or not because both are possible.$$0\ 0\ T \\{\color{Green} 1}\ {\color{Red} 1}\ T \\1\ 0\ F \\{\color{Yellow} 1}\ {\color{Red} 1}\ T$$ 1 votes 1 votes rajankakaniya commented Apr 4, 2021 reply Follow Share All hill-stations have a lake. Ooty has two lakes. Means ‘every hill station has at least one lake’. (>=1) Ooty has two lakes. This means Ooty may or may not hill-station. Extra: Say given : All hill-stations have a lake. Ooty has one lake. Then also we can not decide Ooty is a hillstation or not. Ooty may or may not hill-station. Say given : All hill-stations have a lake. Ooty has no lake. Then we can say that Ooty is not a hill-station. Please, correct me if I am wrong. 1 votes 1 votes Please log in or register to add a comment.
6 votes 6 votes Every hill station has a lake means "every hill station has at least one lake". That means a hill station can have more than one lakes. But, a place without any lake cannot be a hill station. So, none can be concluded. Ashish Deshmukh answered Feb 13, 2016 Ashish Deshmukh comment Share Follow See all 0 reply Please log in or register to add a comment.