Correct Answer is option A.
A: No tigers are non-hunting animals
This is logically equivalent because if all tigers are hunting animals, then it's impossible for any tiger to be a non-hunting animal. This is called the contrapositive, and it always holds the same truth value as the original statement.
Other options are incorrect:
B: Some hunting animals are tigers
This could be true, but it's not equivalent. It only says some hunting animals are tigers — not all tigers are hunting animals.
C: No hunting animals are tigers
This directly contradicts the original statement. If all tigers are hunting animals, then clearly some hunting animals (the tigers) must exist.
D: Some hunting animals are not tigers
This might be true in reality, but it says nothing about whether all tigers are hunting animals. It's unrelated to the original statement's logic.
