275 views
3 3 votes

Which of the following languages are context-free? For any string $s$, let $n_x(s)$ denote the number of occurrences of the symbol $x$ in $s$.

$L_1:\left\{w \in\{a, b\}^* \mid w=u v\right.$ for some $u, v \in\{a, b\}^{+}$where $\left.n_a(u)=n_b(v)\right\}$

$L_2$ : The intersection of $L_A=\left\{x \# y \mid x, y \in\{0,1\}^{+}, x=\right. \left.y^R\right\}$ and $L_B$, the language defined by the regular expression $0^* 1^* \# 1^* 0^*$.

$L_3$ : The intersection of the languages $L_C=\left\{a^i b^i c^j \mid i, j \geq 1\right\}$ and $L_D=\left\{a^i b^j c^j \mid\right. i, j \geq 1\}$.

  1. $L_1$ only
     
  2. $L_1$ and $L_2$ only
     
  3. $L_2$ and $L_3$ only
     
  4. All of $L_1, L_2$, and $L_3$

1 Answer

1 1 vote

Analysis of $L_1$ : CONTEXT-FREE

  • $L_1=\left\{w \in\{a, b\}^* \mid w=u v\right.$ for some $u, v \in\{a, b\}^{+}$where $\left.n_a(u)=n_b(v)\right\}$
     
  • This language is context-free. It can be recognized by a non-deterministic pushdown automaton (NPDA).
     
  • How it works: An NPDA can non-deterministically "guess" where the string $u$ ends and $v$ begins.

1. While reading the part it assumes is $u$, it pushes a symbol onto the stack for every a it sees.

2. When it guesses the split point, it starts reading the part it assumes is $v$.

3. While reading $v$, it pops a symbol from the stack for every b it sees.

4. If the stack is empty at the end of the string, that particular path of computation accepts. Because a valid accepting path exists, the language is context-free.

Analysis of $L_2$ : CONTEXT-FREE

  • $L_2=L_A \cap L_B$, where $L_A=\left\{x \# y \mid x, y \in\{0,1\}^{+}, x=y^R\right\}$ and $L_B$ is from the regex $0^* 1^* \# 1^* 0^*$.
     
  • This language is context-free based on a crucial closure property.

1. $L_A$ is the language of marked palindromes, a classic example of a context-free language.

2. $\quad L_B$ is described by a regular expression, which by definition makes it a regular language.

3. Key Rule: The family of context-free languages is closed under intersection with regular languages.

  • Since we are intersecting a CFL ( $L_A$ ) with a regular language ( $L_B$ ), the result ( $L_2$ ) must be context-free.

Analysis of L3:

The language is defined as the intersection of two other languages: $L_3=L_C \cap L_D$, where:

  • $L_C=\left\{a^i b^i c^j \mid i, j \geq 1\right\}$
     
  • $L_D=\left\{a^i b^j c^j \mid i, j \geq 1\right\}$

Analyze the Intersection ($L_C \cap L_D$ ):

The intersection of $L_C$ and $L_D$ is therefore the language $\left\{a^n b^n c^n \mid n \geq 1\right\}$.
The language $\left\{a^n b^n c^n \mid n \geq 1\right\}$ is the canonical example of a language that is not context-free. A PDA has only one stack, which allows it to compare two counts (like matching $a^n$ to $b^n$ ), but it does not have enough memory to verify a third independent count.

Answer:
Position:
Show:

Related questions

3 3 votes
1 1 answer
289
289 views
GO Classes asked Oct 30, 2025
289 views
Consider the following languages. Which of them are context-free?$$L_1:\left\{w \in\{a, b\}^* \mid\right.$$$w$ contains a string of the form $a^n b^n$ as a subsequence, f...
3 3 votes
2 2 answers
312
312 views
GO Classes asked Oct 30, 2025
312 views
Consider the following context-free grammar $G$, with the set of variables $\{S, A, C, X, Y\}$, the set of terminal symbols $\{a, b, c\}$, and $S$ as the start variable. ...
3 3 votes
1 1 answer
206
206 views
GO Classes asked Oct 30, 2025
206 views
Consider the following context-free grammar $G$, where $S, X$, and $Y$ are the variables (nonterminals), $a, b$, and $c$ are the terminal symbols, $S$ is the start variab...
3 3 votes
2 2 answers
328
328 views
GO Classes asked Oct 30, 2025
328 views
Which of the regular expressions given below represents the language accepted by this DFA?l. $\left(0+101^* 01+10\left(1+010^* 10\right)^* 01\right)^*$II. $\left(0+1\left...