271 views
1 1 vote

Let $\mathbb{N}=\{1,2,3, \ldots\}$ be the set of natural numbers. Let $\Sigma=\{a, b\}$ be an alphabet.

Which of the following statements is/are TRUE?

  1. THE SET OF ALL LANGUAGES OVER $\Sigma$ IS COUNTABLY INFINITE.
     
  2. THE SET OF ALL COMPUTABLE FUNCTIONS $f: \mathbb{N} \rightarrow \mathbb{N}$ IS COUNTABLE.
     
  3. THE SET OF ALL FINITE SUBSETS OF $\mathbb{N}$ IS COUNTABLE.
     
  4. THE SET OF ALL CONTEXT-FREE GRAMMARS (CFGS) OVER $\Sigma$ IS UNCOUNTABLE.

1 Answer

2 2 votes

A. THE SET OF ALL LANGUAGES OVER $\Sigma$ IS COUNTABLY INFINITE.

  • FALSE.
     
  • The set of all strings over $\Sigma, \Sigma^*$, is countably infinite.
     
  • A language is any subset of $\Sigma^*$.
     
  • The set of all languages is the power set of $\Sigma^*, P\left(\Sigma^*\right)$.
     
  • By Cantor's theorem, the power set of a countably infinite set is uncountable.

B. THE SET OF ALL COMPUTABLE FUNCTIONS $f: \mathbb{N} \rightarrow \mathbb{N}$ IS COUNTABLE.

  • True.
     
  • A function is computable if there exists a Turing Machine (TM) that computes it and halts on all inputs.
     
  • Every TM can be finitely described by its rules and states, which can be encoded as a finitelength string (e.g., $\langle M\rangle)$.
     
  • The set of all possible finite-length strings (and thus all possible TM encodings) is countably infinite.
     
  • The set of all computable functions corresponds to a subset of these TM encodings (specifically, the ones that halt on all inputs).
     
  • A subset of a countable set is also countable.

C. THE SET OF ALL FINITE SUBSETS OF $\mathbb{N}$ IS COUNTABLE.

  • TRUE.
     
  • Let $S_k$ be the set of all subsets of $\mathbb{N}$ with exactly $k$ elements.
     
  • $S_0=\{\emptyset\}$ (Countable)
     
  • $S_1=\{\{1\},\{2\}, \ldots\}$ (Countable)
     
  • $S_k$ is countable for any finite $k$.
     
  • The set of all finite subsets is the union $S_0 \cup S_1 \cup S_2 \cup \ldots$.
     
  • This is a countable union of countable sets, which is countable.
D. THE SET OF ALL CONTEXT-FREE GRAMMARS (CFGS) OVER $\Sigma$ IS UNCOUNTABLE.
  • FALSE.
     
  • A CFG is defined by a 4-tuple $G=(V, T, P, S)$, where all components $(V, T, P, S)$ are finite.
     
  • Because every component is finite, the entire grammar can be described by a finite-length string.
     
  • The set of all possible finite-length strings is countable. Therefore, the set of all CFGs is countable.
Answer:
Position:
Show:

Related questions

3 3 votes
3 3 answers
561
561 views
GO Classes asked Nov 4, 2025
561 views
Consider a Deterministic Finite Automaton (DFA) $M=\left(Q, \Sigma, \delta, q_0, F\right)$ where:$\Sigma=\{a, b\}$ $Q=\left\{S_0, S_a, S_b, S_{e r r}\right\}$ $q_0=S_0$ $...
1 1 vote
1 1 answer
232
232 views
GO Classes asked Nov 4, 2025
232 views
Consider the following decision problems:(P1) : Given a Context-Free Grammar $G$ and a regular expression $R$, is the language $L(G) \backslash L(R)$ also a Context-Free ...
1 1 vote
3 3 answers
360
360 views
GO Classes asked Nov 4, 2025
360 views
Consider the following context-free grammars:$$\begin{aligned}& G_1: S \rightarrow A|B, A \rightarrow a A| a, B \rightarrow b B \mid b \\& G_2: S \rightarrow A B, A \righ...
2 2 votes
3 3 answers
395
395 views
GO Classes asked Nov 4, 2025
395 views
Consider the following languages over the alphabet $\{a, b, c\}$ :$L_1=\left\{w c w \mid w \in\{a, b\}^*\right\}$ $L_2=\left\{w c w^R \mid w \in\{a, b\}^*\right\}$ $L_3=\...