retagged by
2,546 views

3 Answers

3 votes
3 votes

Both are used to convert NFA to DFA.

There is a disadvantage with subset construction method , as we have to design a big transition table for the states with their input transition and which is very complex and takes a lot of time.

Its time complexity comes in 2n , which is exponential .

Hence we use lazy evaluation to avoid designing such big transition table .

hence, option C.

edited by
1 votes
1 votes
C. A OR B IS THE ANS

EVERYBODY KNOWS SUBSET CONSTRUCTION IS THE METHOD TO CONVERT FROM NFA TO DFA

AND LAZY EVALUATION JUST REFERS TO THE RENAMING OF STATES THAT WE GOT FROM SUBSET CONSTRUCTION.. THAT MEANS IT IS JUST A DELAY TO SIMPLIFY THE DIAGRAM

REFER HERE

https://quickgrid.wordpress.com/2015/10/30/converting-nfa-to-dfa-by-complete-and-lazy-subset-construction/
0 votes
0 votes

Subset construction

Option A

Since Subset construction is method of converting NFA to DFA

Lazy evaluation is renaming states not converting 

Even without Renaming we can have NFA to DFA

Let me know if any thing wrong

Related questions

0 votes
0 votes
1 answer
1
aditi19 asked Dec 14, 2018
1,356 views
convert the following NFA to DFA
1 votes
1 votes
0 answers
3
smsubham asked Apr 8, 2018
840 views
Can you give an example of NFA which has n states and its corresponding DFA has 2^n states?
1 votes
1 votes
2 answers
4
ashishgateashish asked Feb 27, 2018
2,560 views
1. Which solution is correct? (or both wrong!)2. Does every 'DFA equivalent' of any NFA has same starting state? if not, please give any smallest example.