• edited by
12,532 views
33 33 votes

The binary relation $R = \{(1, 1), (2, 1), (2, 2), (2, 3), (2, 4), (3, 1), (3, 2), (3, 3), (3, 4)\}$ on the set $A=\{1, 2, 3, 4\}$ is

  1. reflexive, symmetric and transitive

  2. neither reflexive, nor irreflexive but transitive

  3. irreflexive, symmetric and transitive

  4. irreflexive and antisymmetric

4 Answers

Best answer
46 46 votes
Not reflexive - $(4,4)$ not present.

Not irreflexive - $(1, 1)$ is present.

Not symmetric - $(2, 1)$ is present but not $(1, 2)$.

Not antisymmetric - $(2, 3)$ and $(3, 2)$ are present.

Not Asymmetric - asymmetry requires both antisymmetry and irreflexivity.

It is transitive.

So, the correct option is $B$.
transitive.
• edited by
0 0 votes

 

correct option is B Neither reflexive, nor irreflexive but transitive


The relation R doesn't contain (4, 4), so R is not a reflexive relation.


Since relation R contains (1,1), (2,2), and (3,3).
Therefore, relation R is also not irreflexive.

That R is transitive, can be checked by systematically checking for all (a, b) and (b, c) in R, whether (a, c) also exists in R.
So, option (b) is correct.

😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊

• edited by
–2 –2 votes

The correct answer is,(B)neither reflexive, nor irreflexive but transitive

Answer:
Position:
Show:

Related questions

31 31 votes
6 answers 6 answers
14.3k
14.3k views
Kathleen asked Sep 25, 2014
14,300 views
Suppose $A$ is a finite set with $n$ elements. The number of elements in the largest equivalence relation of A is$n$$n^2$$1$$n+1$
26 26 votes
4 answers 4 answers
9.7k
9.7k views
Arjun asked Aug 12, 2018
9,713 views
Let $R$ be a binary relation on $A = \{a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h\}$ represented by the following two component digraph. Find the smallest integers $m$ and $n$ such that $m <...
26 26 votes
6 answers 6 answers
7.5k
7.5k views
Kathleen asked Sep 26, 2014
7,453 views
Prove by induction that the expression for the number of diagonals in a polygon of $n$ sides is $\frac{n(n-3)}{2}$
43 43 votes
8 answers 8 answers
19.7k
19.7k views
Kathleen asked Sep 25, 2014
19,660 views
Let $R_1$ and $R_2$ be two equivalence relations on a set. Consider the following assertions:$R_1 \cup R_2$ is an equivalence relation$R_1 \cap R_2$ is an equivalence rel...