0 votes 0 votes "once you have assumed a don't care as '1' u can't use the same don't care for grouping zeros and vice versa." is it correct or not?? Verma Ashish asked Aug 19, 2018 Verma Ashish 1.2k views answer comment Share Follow See all 3 Comments See all 3 3 Comments reply Shaik Masthan commented Aug 19, 2018 reply Follow Share First you fix the notation which you want ( either POS or SOP ) then fix the Don't care term as per your requirement When you have don't care terms in your function, Free variables and Prime Implicant may differ to POS and SOP forms 0 votes 0 votes Verma Ashish commented Aug 19, 2018 reply Follow Share Your reply is not according to my question. But my doubt become clear now. The confusion come from this question- https://gateoverflow.in/936/gate2003-45 0 votes 0 votes Shaik Masthan commented Aug 19, 2018 reply Follow Share that is actually two questions, they separately ask the sop and pos form literals... ON SOLVING FOR SOP :- Fix the don't care terms to 1 which you want, neglect remaining and now form the boolean expression ON SOLVING FOR POS :- Fix the don't care terms to 0 which you want, neglect remaining and now form the boolean expression this is i explained in my previous comment. Your reply is not according to my question. When you have don't care terms in your function, Free variables and Prime Implicant may differ to POS and SOP forms this is extra information i provided.... this is the consequence of the don't care terms But my doubt become clear now. OK 0 votes 0 votes Please log in or register to add a comment.
0 votes 0 votes PS: Some wrong beliefs about don't cares "once you have assumed a don't care as '1' u can't use the same don't care for grouping zeros and vice versa" "if don't care has been used in POS than can't be used in SOP" Both these statements are wrong. Don't care simply means just don't care -- say we use don't care d3d3 for grouping 11 in SOP we can use d3d3 for grouping 0 in POS. (The literals in SOP and POS may not be the same) Pavan Karthik answered Aug 23, 2018 Pavan Karthik comment Share Follow See 1 comment See all 1 1 comment reply Verma Ashish commented Aug 23, 2018 reply Follow Share if a function has don't cares then it can be represented as many functions which results the same. Let F is a function which contains some don't cares. Let f1 abd f2 be minimal sop and pos which represents the same function F Then f1 is not equivalent to f2 if Same don't care(s) is used for minimal sop as well as for minimal pos. f1 and f2 are equivalent if they contain different don't cares for calculation. In both the cases f1 and f2 represents the function F but they might not be same. 0 votes 0 votes Please log in or register to add a comment.