edited by
2,154 views
0 votes
0 votes

if there is no allocation sequence that allows the processes to finish executing, then the system is in an unsafe state.

This is not equivalent to the  "If the system is in an unsafe state, then there is no allocation sequence that allows the processes to finish executing

edited by

1 Answer

0 votes
0 votes
If the process is in a safe state, it will never lead to deadlock.

If the process is in an unsafe state, it may or may not lead to deadlock.

Related questions

1.7k
views
1 answers
0 votes
Shubhanshu asked Dec 2, 2017
1,677 views
Consider a system with 12 tape drives with:ProcessMax Need AllocatedP1105P293Is this system is in a safe or unsafe state? If it is not safe then under which condition system leads to deadlock?
6.2k
views
1 answers
8 votes
Shubhanshu asked Aug 17, 2017
6,155 views
Why unsafe state not leads to deadlock?Please don't redirect to any other link. Explain it by taking an example.
1.3k
views
1 answers
0 votes
Souvik33 asked Nov 19, 2022
1,296 views
MSQ Which of the following statements is/are TRUE?If safe state exists, deadlock can be avoided if resources are allocated properlyIf safe state exists, ... is possible, if resources are poorly allocatedUnsafe state may lead to a deadlock
2.3k
views
1 answers
2 votes