• edited by
34,715 views
49 49 votes

Let $A$ be the adjacency matrix of the graph with vertices $\{1,2,3,4,5\}.$

Let $\lambda_{1}, \lambda_{2}, \lambda_{3}, \lambda_{4}$, and $\lambda_{5}$ be the five eigenvalues of $A$. Note that these eigenvalues need not be distinct.

The value of $\lambda_{1}+\lambda_{2}+\lambda_{3}+\lambda_{4}+\lambda_{5}=$____________

6 Answers

Best answer
83 83 votes

There are two possible choices for the adjacency matrix for the given undirected graph $G$ and hence two possible answers.

Your first choice could be:

$A(G) = \begin{pmatrix}
0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0\\
1 & 0 & 1 & 1 & 0 \\
0 & 1 & 1 & 0 & 1 \\
0 & 1 & 0 & 1 & 1 \\
0 & 0 & 1 & 1 & 0 \\
\end{pmatrix}$

The problem with this matrix is that Handshaking lemma is not satisfied here because sum of each row gives the total degree of each vertex and so here total degree = $12$ and total edges in the graph is $7$.

The reason is, this matrix is made on the assumption that self-loop has degree $1$ and that's why $\textbf{Handshaking Lemma}$ will be failed here because the reason we take the degree of the self-loop as $2$ to make Handshaking Lemma satisfied.

Hence, if we make the assumption that self-loop has degree $1$ then the answer will be $2$ because of self-loops, each with degree $1.$

Now, your second choice could be:

$A(G) = \begin{pmatrix}
0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0\\
1 & 0 & 1 & 1 & 0 \\
0 & 1 & 2 & 0 & 1 \\
0 & 1 & 0 & 2 & 1 \\
0 & 0 & 1 & 1 & 0 \\
\end{pmatrix}$

Here, Handshaking lemma is satisfied because total degree=$14$ because sum of all the rows is $14.$ and Hence, total number of edges is $7.$

Again the reason is, this matrix is made on the assumption that self-loop has degree $2$ and that's why $\textbf{Handshaking Lemma}$ will be satisfied here because the reason we take the degree of the self-loop as $2$ to make Handshaking Lemma satisfied.

Hence, if we make the assumption that self-loop has degree $2$ then the answer will be $4$ because of self-loops, each with degree $2.$

Most probably, GATE Authority will give answer as $2$ because the convention follows in most of the books whether it is Diestel, Bondy & Murthy, Douglas B. West, Narsingh Deo or Harary, All follows first convention but I have given the true picture so that all of you know about the issue with this question.

Edit: After challenge, answer has been changed from 2 to 2 or 4.

• edited by
56 56 votes

Firstly convert the given undirected graph into an adjacency matrix, we will get:

$A=\begin{pmatrix} 0& 1 &0 &0 &0 \\ 1& 0 &1 &1 &0 \\ 0& 1 & 1 &0 &1 \\ 0& 1 & 0 &1 &1 \\ 0&0 &1 &1 &0 \end{pmatrix}$

now we know that the summation of the eigenvalue is equal to the trace of the matrix.

so the trace of matrix is:

  • $\lambda_1=0$
  • $\lambda_2=0$
  • $\lambda_3=1$
  • $\lambda_4=1$
  • $\lambda_5=0$

$\therefore \lambda_1 +\lambda_2 +\lambda_3 +\lambda_4+ \lambda_5=0+0+1+1+0=2$

correct answer is $2$

2 2 votes

           Trace (matrix) : Sum of diagonal elements

 

so , λ1+λ2+λ3+λ4+λ5 = ( 0 + 0 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 0 ) = 2

4 flags:
✌ (santu1203 “wrong answer”)
✌ Edit necessary (rhl)
✌ Low quality (Prem_S)
✌ Low quality (Nikhil_Kumar_Singh)
0 0 votes
The sum of eigen values of a matrix is nothing but sum of diagonal.
The diagonal element in Adjacency matrix is 1 if that element has self loop.
So basically sum of eigen values = total self loops in graph.
Here ans =2 as we have 2 self loops.
Answer:
Position:
Show:

Related questions

66 66 votes
8 8 answers
27.5k
27.5k views
admin asked Feb 15, 2023
27,464 views
Let\[A=\left[\begin{array}{llll}1 & 2 & 3 & 4 \\4 & 1 & 2 & 3 \\3 & 4 & 1 & 2 \\2 & 3 & 4 & 1\end{array}\right]\]and\[B=\left[\begin{array}{llll}3 & 4 & 1 & 2 \\4 & 1 & 2...
6 6 votes
1 answers 1 answer
1.5k
1.5k views
Bikram asked May 14, 2017
1,473 views
Consider the $5\times 5$ matrix below :$\begin{bmatrix} 1&0 &0 &0 &1 \\ 0& 1 & 1 & 1 & 0\\ 0& 1 &1 &1 &0 \\ 0& 1 &1 &1 &0 \\ 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \end{bmatrix}$The product ...
1 1 vote
1 1 answer
326
326 views
soujanyareddy13 asked Aug 29, 2020
326 views
True/False Question :Let $A\in M_{n}\left ( \mathbb{R} \right )$ be upper triangular with all diagonal entries $1$ such that $A\neq I$. Then $A$ is not diagonalizable.