2.8k views

The following C function takes a single-linked list of integers as a parameter and rearranges the elements of the list. The function is called with the list containing the integers $1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7$ in the given order. What will be the contents of the list after function completes execution?

struct node {
int value;
struct node *next;
};

void rearrange(struct node *list) {
struct node *p, *q;
int temp;
if (!list || !list -> next) return;
p = list; q = list -> next;
while(q) {
temp = p -> value; p->value =  q -> value;
q->value = temp; p = q ->next;
q = p? p ->next : 0;
}
}

1. $1, 2 ,3, 4, 5, 6, 7$
2. $2, 1, 4 ,3, 6, 5, 7$
3. $1, 3, 2, 5, 4, 7, 6$
4. $2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 1$
edited | 2.8k views
0

The loop is interchanging the adjacent elements of the list. But after each interchange, next interchange starts from the unchanged elements only (due to $p = q \rightarrow next$;).

$1$st iteration $1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7$
$\Rightarrow 2, 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7$

$2$nd iteration $2, 1, 4, 3, 5, 6, 7$

$3$rd iteration $2, 1, 4, 3, 6, 5, 7$

$p$ pointing to null $q$ pointing to $7$, as $p$ is false hence $q=p?$ $p \rightarrow next$:$0$; will return  $q=0$ ending the loop

edited
–1
correction, p will point to 7, and q=p true, hence q = p->next = null
+1

can someone explain me this line

q = p? p ->next : 0;

After first exchange p points to q->next, so this expression should evaluate to false making q=0...but its executing p->next..why?? what am i missing? @Arjun @ManaliSikdar

+9
it is q = p, not q == p. q = p? this returns true, if p is any non-zero value.
+1
oh okay...got it.
0

how p will point to null?

p will point to 7 and q will point to NULL (q = p->next as p is a non zero value)

Edit:
Program: http://ideone.com/T0yVty

+1
q = p? p ->next : 0;

Basically it is ternary operator . we can rewrite this expression in simplified form

q = (p!=NULL)? p -> next : 0;

when (p!=NULL ) true then q = p ->next will be assigned when this condition is false then q = 0 will be assigned.

+1
Yes, the only time when question generator algorithm went wrong :P
–1 vote
ans b)

1
2