1,403 views

1 Answer

1 1 vote
Here both the languages can be implemented by DFA in Polynomial time

So Both are not NPC .

NPC problems are very tough problems like:->

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_NP-complete_problems

So D is Ans.
• edited by
Position:
Show:

Related questions

1 1 vote
1 1 answer
2.2k
2.2k views
learner_geek asked Aug 15, 2017
2,169 views
Is complement of language same type or not decidable by CFL and recursive language or not???Grammar is ambiguous or not?Grammar in regular/CFL/rel decidable or not?
0 0 votes
0 0 answers
430
430 views
Aboveallplayer asked Jan 22, 2017
430 views
which of the following is decidable?a)the set of TM whose language contains 0*b) the set of all TM who accept same string after visiting atmost 100 distinct Tape cellc)...
0 0 votes
1 1 answer
1.4k
1.4k views
radha gogia asked Jul 20, 2015
1,448 views
I am a bit confused in this logic according to me all NPC are NP so that means all NPC are reducible to NP but since NPC are NP-hard as well so I guess that is not possib...
8 8 votes
0 0 answers
1.3k
1.3k views
Manu Thakur asked Sep 9, 2017
1,276 views
Can someone please verify my answers on the following given languages?Please note that RE=Recursive Enumerable, LBA=Linear Bounded Automata, and TM=Turing Machine$\text{H...