Option (a)
$$
L_a = { x \in {a,b}^* \mid \#_a(x) = \#_b(x) }
$$
(i.e., all strings with an equal number of $a$'s and $b$'s, in any order).
Claim: $L_a$ is not regular.
Proof (Pumping Lemma):
Assume $L_a$ is regular. Then there exists a pumping length $p \geq 1$. Consider the string
$$
w = a^p b^p.
$$
Clearly, $w \in L_a$ since it contains $p$ $a$'s and $p$ $b$'s, and $|w| = 2p \geq p$.
By the Pumping Lemma, $w = xyz$ with
$|xy| \leq p$,
$|y| \geq 1$,
$xy^i z \in L_a$ for all $i \geq 0$.
Since the first $p$ symbols of $w$ are all $a$'s, condition (1) implies $y = a^k$ for some $1 \leq k \leq p$.
Now consider $i = 0$:
$$
xy^0z = a^{p - k} b^p.
$$
This string has $p - k$ $a$'s and $p$ $b$'s, so $\#_a \ne \#_b$, and thus $xy^0z \notin L_a$, contradicting the Pumping Lemma.
Hence, $L_a$ is not regular.
Remark: Although $L_a$ includes strings like abab or baab, the Pumping Lemma only requires one string in the language of sufficient length to derive a contradiction. The choice $a^p b^p \in L_a$ is valid and sufficient.
PDA for same:

Option (b)
$$
L_b = { a^n b^n \mid n \geq 1 }
$$
Claim: $L_b$ is not regular.
Proof (Pumping Lemma):
Assume $L_b$ is regular. Let $p$ be the pumping length and choose $w = a^p b^p \in L_b$. As before, $w = xyz$ with $|xy| \leq p$, so $y = a^k$, $k \geq 1$.
Then $xy^0z = a^{p - k} b^p \notin L_b$, violating the Pumping Lemma.
Hence, $L_b$ is not regular.
PDA for same:

Option (c)
$$
L_c = { x \in {a,b}^* \mid \#_a(x) > \#_b(x) }
$$
Claim: $L_c$ is not regular.
Proof (Myhill–Nerode):
Consider again $S = { a^n \mid n \geq 0 }$. For $i < j$, let $z = b^i$. Then:
Thus, $a^i$ and $a^j$ are distinguishable. Infinitely many equivalence classes ⇒ $L_c$ is not regular.
Option (d)
$$
L_d = { a^m b^n \mid m \geq 1,\ n \geq 1 }
$$
Claim: $L_d$ is regular.
Proof (Regular Expression):
Every string in $L_d$ consists of one or more $a$'s followed by one or more $b$'s, with no interleaving. This is exactly described by the regular expression. $a^+b^+$
Since a regular expression exists, $L_d$ is regular.
Alternative (Myhill–Nerode):
The language can be recognized by a DFA with the following states:
$q_0$: start (no input),
$q_1$: seen at least one $a$, no $b$ yet,
$q_2$: seen at least one $a$ followed by at least one $b$ (accepting),
$q_3$: seen a $b$ before any $a$, or seen $ba$ (dead/rejecting state).
Only finitely many states are needed, so the Myhill–Nerode relation has finitely many equivalence classes. Hence, $L_d$ is regular.
Among the four options, only Option (d) defines a regular language. Options (a), (b), and (c) all require unbounded comparison or counting of symbol frequencies, which cannot be achieved by any finite automaton.
$$
\boxed{\text{d. } L = {a^m b^n \mid m \geq 1,\ n \geq 1} \text{ is regular}}
$$