53 views

1 Answer

0 votes
0 votes

 Step 1: Identify the Premises and Conclusion
$Premises$:
\[1. \text{ } P \rightarrow Q\]
\[2. \text{ } P\]

$Conclusion$:
\[3. \text{ } Q\]

Step 2: Translate into Symbolic Form:
\[1. \text{ } P \rightarrow Q\]
\[2. \text{ } P\]
\[ \therefore \text{ } Q\]

Step 3: Apply Logical Rules:
- We'll use the law of modus ponens:
\[\frac{P \rightarrow Q \text{ and } P}{\therefore Q}\]

Step 4: Evaluate Validity:
- By modus ponens, from premises 1 and 2, we can deduce the conclusion (Q). Therefore, the argument is valid because the conclusion logically follows from the premises.

Related questions

0 votes
0 votes
1 answer
1
Çșȇ ʛấẗẻ asked Mar 20, 2023
402 views
how to write if and only if symbolic form explain in detail????
0 votes
0 votes
0 answers
2
curious mind asked Jan 1, 2023
323 views
A relation R1 : aRb iff (a congruent b) modulo 5 and relation R2 : aRb iff (a congruent b modulo 7). What will be R1 U R2 ?
0 votes
0 votes
1 answer
3
Anand67222 asked Oct 14, 2023
334 views
How many simple directed (unweighted) graphs on the set of vertices {v0,v1,…v5} are there that have at most one edge between any pair of vertices? (That is, for two ver...