menu
search
Log In
Quick search syntax
tags tag:apple
author user:martin
title title:apple
content content:apple
exclude -tag:apple
force match +apple
views views:100
score score:10
answers answers:2
is accepted isaccepted:true
is closed isclosed:true

Subjects

Recent questions tagged mathematical-logic

Network Sites

 GO Mechanical
 GO Electrical
 GO Electronics
 GO Civil
 CSE Doubts

Webpage for Mathematical Logic

Important Question Types:

  1. Checking validity of First Order Logic Statements
  2. Checking validity of Propositional Logic

Recent questions tagged mathematical-logic

1 vote
2 answers
1
NIELIT 2017 July Scientist B (IT) - Section B: 13
Which of the following statements is false? $(P\land Q)\lor(\sim P\land Q)\lor(P \land \sim Q)$ is equal to $\sim Q\land \sim P$ $(P\land Q)\lor(\sim P\land Q)\lor(P \wedge \sim Q)$ is equal to $Q\lor P$ ... $(P\land Q)\lor(\sim P\land Q)\lor (P \land \sim Q)$ is equal to $P\lor (Q\land \sim P)$
Which of the following statements is false? $(P\land Q)\lor(\sim P\land Q)\lor(P \land \sim Q)$ is equal to $\sim Q\land \sim P$ $(P\land Q)\lor(\sim P\land Q)\lor(P \wedge \sim Q)$ is equal to $Q\lor P$ $(P\wedge Q)\lor (\sim P\land Q)\lor(P \wedge \sim Q)$ is equal to $Q\lor (P\wedge \sim Q)$ $(P\land Q)\lor(\sim P\land Q)\lor (P \land \sim Q)$ is equal to $P\lor (Q\land \sim P)$
asked Mar 30 in Mathematical Logic Lakshman Patel RJIT 49 views
0 votes
2 answers
2
NIELIT 2017 July Scientist B (CS) - Section B: 16
Which of the following propositions is tautology? $(p\lor q)\to q$ $p\lor (q\to p)$ $p\lor (p\to q)$ Both (B) and (C)
Which of the following propositions is tautology? $(p\lor q)\to q$ $p\lor (q\to p)$ $p\lor (p\to q)$ Both (B) and (C)
asked Mar 30 in Mathematical Logic Lakshman Patel RJIT 61 views
0 votes
1 answer
3
UGCNET-Jan2017-III: 59
Which of the following statements is true? The sentence $S$ is a logical consequence of $S_{1},\dots,S_{n}$ if and only if $S_{1}\wedge S_{2} \wedge \dots \wedge S_{n}\rightarrow S$ is satisfiable. The sentence $S$ ... of $S_{1},\dots,S_{n}$ if and only if $S_{1}\wedge S_{2}\wedge \dots \wedge S_{n}\wedge S$ is inconsistent.
Which of the following statements is true? The sentence $S$ is a logical consequence of $S_{1},\dots,S_{n}$ if and only if $S_{1}\wedge S_{2} \wedge \dots \wedge S_{n}\rightarrow S$ is satisfiable. The sentence $S$ is a logical consequence of $S_{1},\dots,S_{n}$ if ... logical consequence of $S_{1},\dots,S_{n}$ if and only if $S_{1}\wedge S_{2}\wedge \dots \wedge S_{n}\wedge S$ is inconsistent.
asked Mar 24 in Discrete Mathematics jothee 168 views
0 votes
2 answers
4
UGCNET-Jan2017-II: 2
Match the following : ...
Match the following : ...
asked Mar 24 in Mathematical Logic jothee 113 views
4 votes
3 answers
5
ISRO2020-73
Given that $B(a)$ means “$a$ is a bear” $F(a)$ means “$a$ is a fish” and $E(a,b)$ means “$a $ eats $b$” Then what is the best meaning of $\forall x [F(x) \to \forall y(E(y,x)\rightarrow b(y))]$ Every fish is eaten by some bear Bears eat only fish Every bear eats fish Only bears eat fish
Given that $B(a)$ means “$a$ is a bear” $F(a)$ means “$a$ is a fish” and $E(a,b)$ means “$a $ eats $b$” Then what is the best meaning of $\forall x [F(x) \to \forall y(E(y,x)\rightarrow b(y))]$ Every fish is eaten by some bear Bears eat only fish Every bear eats fish Only bears eat fish
asked Jan 13 in Mathematical Logic Satbir 611 views
1 vote
1 answer
6
CMI2019-B-5
In the land of Twitter, there are two kinds of people: knights (also called outragers), who always tell the truth, and knaves (also called trolls), who always lie. It so happened that a person with handle @anand tweeted something offensive. It was not known ... $3:$ My lawyer always tells the truth. Which of the above suspects are innocent, and which are guilty? Explain your reasoning.
In the land of Twitter, there are two kinds of people: knights (also called outragers), who always tell the truth, and knaves (also called trolls), who always lie. It so happened that a person with handle @anand tweeted something offensive. It was not known ... Suspect $3:$ My lawyer always tells the truth. Which of the above suspects are innocent, and which are guilty? Explain your reasoning.
asked Sep 13, 2019 in Mathematical Logic gatecse 148 views
3 votes
1 answer
7
Mathematical Logic Ques:Self doubt
“Not every satisfiable logic is valid” Representation of it will be $1)\sim \left ( \forall S(x)\rightarrow V(x) \right )$ or $2)\sim \left ( \forall S(x)\vee V(x) \right )$ Among $1)$ and $2)$, which one is correct? and why?
“Not every satisfiable logic is valid” Representation of it will be $1)\sim \left ( \forall S(x)\rightarrow V(x) \right )$ or $2)\sim \left ( \forall S(x)\vee V(x) \right )$ Among $1)$ and $2)$, which one is correct? and why?
asked Jun 4, 2019 in Mathematical Logic srestha 284 views
2 votes
1 answer
8
Doubt on GATE Question
Read the statements: All women are entrepreneurs. Some women are doctors. Which of the following conclusions can be logically inferred from the above statements? All women are doctors All doctors are entrepreneurs All entrepreneurs are women Some entrepreneurs are doctors ... Is it because , if we make set of doctor as 0, then All doctors are entrepreneurs is meaningless.
Read the statements: All women are entrepreneurs. Some women are doctors. Which of the following conclusions can be logically inferred from the above statements? All women are doctors All doctors are entrepreneurs All entrepreneurs are women Some entrepreneurs are doctors Why here $2)$ ... ans?? Is it because , if we make set of doctor as 0, then All doctors are entrepreneurs is meaningless.
asked Jun 1, 2019 in Mathematical Logic srestha 131 views
1 vote
1 answer
9
Mathematical Logic: Doubt on meaning of statement
The notation $\exists ! x P(x)$ denotes the proposition there exists a unique $x$ such that $P(x)$ ... What will be answer here?? Is the assumption only for left hand side and not right hand side??
The notation $\exists ! x P(x)$ denotes the proposition “there exists a unique $x$ such that $P(x)$ is true”. Give the truth values of the following statements : I)${\color{Red} {\exists ! x P(x)}} \rightarrow \exists x P(x)$ II)${\color{Red} {\exists ! x\sim P(x)}} \rightarrow \neg \forall x P(x)$ What will be answer here?? Is the assumption only for left hand side and not right hand side??
asked May 31, 2019 in Mathematical Logic srestha 188 views
0 votes
1 answer
10
Proposition Logic Question
Are these propositions? 1.This sentence is true 2.This sentence is false Aren’t these liar paradox?
Are these propositions? 1.This sentence is true 2.This sentence is false Aren’t these liar paradox?
asked May 30, 2019 in Mathematical Logic Reshu $ingh 265 views
1 vote
0 answers
11
Self Doubt:Mathematical Logic
Represent these two statement in first order logic: $A)$ Only Alligators eat humans $B)$ Every Alligator eats humans Is Every represents $\equiv \exists$ and Only represents $\equiv \forall$ ?? Can we differentiate it with verb ‘eat’ and ‘eats’??
Represent these two statement in first order logic: $A)$ Only Alligators eat humans $B)$ Every Alligator eats humans Is Every represents $\equiv \exists$ and Only represents $\equiv \forall$ ?? Can we differentiate it with verb ‘eat’ and ‘eats’??
asked May 18, 2019 in Mathematical Logic srestha 142 views
0 votes
0 answers
12
Made Easy Test Series:Discrete Math-Mathematical Logic
Consider the following first order logic statement $I)\forall x\forall yP\left ( x,y \right )$ $II)\forall x\exists yP\left ( x,y \right )$ $III)\exists x\exists yP\left ( x,y \right )$ $III)\exists x\forall yP\left ( x,y \right )$ Which one ... true , then $III),IV)$ is true $B)$ If $IV)$ is true , then $II),III)$ is true $C)$ None of these
Consider the following first order logic statement $I)\forall x\forall yP\left ( x,y \right )$ $II)\forall x\exists yP\left ( x,y \right )$ $III)\exists x\exists yP\left ( x,y \right )$ $III)\exists x\forall yP\left ( x,y \right )$ ... $II)$ is true , then $III),IV)$ is true $B)$ If $IV)$ is true , then $II),III)$ is true $C)$ None of these
asked Apr 27, 2019 in Mathematical Logic srestha 136 views
3 votes
1 answer
13
Kenneth Rosen Edition 7th Exercise 2.1 Question 9 (Page No. 125)
Determine whether each of these statements is true or false. $0$ $ \epsilon$ $\phi$ $\phi$ $\epsilon$ {$0$} {$0$} $ \subset$ {$ \phi$} $\phi$ $\subset$ {$0$} {$0$} $\epsilon$ {$0$} {$0$} $\subset$ {$0$} {$\phi$} $\subseteq$ {$\phi$}
Determine whether each of these statements is true or false. $0$ $ \epsilon$ $\phi$ $\phi$ $\epsilon$ {$0$} {$0$} $ \subset$ {$ \phi$} $\phi$ $\subset$ {$0$} {$0$} $\epsilon$ {$0$} {$0$} $\subset$ {$0$} {$\phi$} $\subseteq$ {$\phi$}
asked Apr 5, 2019 in Mathematical Logic Pooja Khatri 91 views
0 votes
0 answers
16
Kenneth Rosen Edition 7th Exercise 1.7 Question 39 (Page No. 92)
Prove that at least one of the real numbers $a_1,a_2,...,a_n$ is greater than or equal to the average of these numbers.What kind of proof did you use?
Prove that at least one of the real numbers $a_1,a_2,...,a_n$ is greater than or equal to the average of these numbers.What kind of proof did you use?
asked Apr 4, 2019 in Mathematical Logic Pooja Khatri 29 views
0 votes
0 answers
18
Kenneth Rosen Edition 7th Exercise 1.7 Question 37 (Page No. 91)
Show that the propositions $p1,p2,p3,p4,$ and $p5$ can be shown to be equivalent by proving that the conditional statements $p1 \rightarrow p4$ , $p3 \rightarrow p1$ ,$p4 \rightarrow p2$ ,$p2 \rightarrow p5$, and $p5 \rightarrow p3$ are true.
Show that the propositions $p1,p2,p3,p4,$ and $p5$ can be shown to be equivalent by proving that the conditional statements $p1 \rightarrow p4$ , $p3 \rightarrow p1$ ,$p4 \rightarrow p2$ ,$p2 \rightarrow p5$, and $p5 \rightarrow p3$ are true.
asked Apr 4, 2019 in Mathematical Logic Pooja Khatri 55 views
0 votes
0 answers
19
Kenneth Rosen Edition 7th Exercise 1.7 Question 36 (Page No. 91)
Show that the propositions $p1,p2,p3$, and $p4$can be shown to be equivalent by showing that $p1 \leftrightarrow p4,p2 \leftrightarrow p3$, and $p1 \leftrightarrow p3$.
Show that the propositions $p1,p2,p3$, and $p4$can be shown to be equivalent by showing that $p1 \leftrightarrow p4,p2 \leftrightarrow p3$, and $p1 \leftrightarrow p3$.
asked Apr 4, 2019 in Mathematical Logic Pooja Khatri 31 views
0 votes
0 answers
20
Kenneth Rosen Edition 7th Exercise 1.7 Question 35 (Page No. 91)
Are these steps for finding the solutions of $\sqrt{x+3=3−x}$ correct? $\sqrt{x+3=3−x}$ is given; $x+3=x2−6x+9$, obtained by squaring both sides of(1); $0=x2−7x+6$, obtained by subtracting $x+3$ from both sides of(2); $0=(x−1)(x−6)$, ... -hand side of(3); $x=1$ or $x=6$,which follows from(4) because $ab=0$ implies that $a=0$ or $b=0$.
Are these steps for finding the solutions of $\sqrt{x+3=3−x}$ correct? $\sqrt{x+3=3−x}$ is given; $x+3=x2−6x+9$, obtained by squaring both sides of(1); $0=x2−7x+6$, obtained by subtracting $x+3$ from both sides of(2); $0=(x−1)(x−6)$, obtained by factoring the right-hand side of(3); $x=1$ or $x=6$,which follows from(4) because $ab=0$ implies that $a=0$ or $b=0$.
asked Apr 4, 2019 in Mathematical Logic Pooja Khatri 46 views
0 votes
0 answers
21
Kenneth Rosen Edition 7th Exercise 1.7 Question 34 (Page No. 91)
Is this reasoning for finding the solutions of the equation $\sqrt{2x^2−1=x}$ correct? $\sqrt{2x^2−1=x}$ is given; $2x^2−1=x^2$, obtained by squaring both sides of (1); $x^2−1=0$, obtained by subtracting $x^2$from both sides of (2); ... left-hand side of$x^2−1$; $x=1$ or $x=−1$,which follows because $ab=0$ implies that $a=0$ or $b=0$
Is this reasoning for finding the solutions of the equation $\sqrt{2x^2−1=x}$ correct? $\sqrt{2x^2−1=x}$ is given; $2x^2−1=x^2$, obtained by squaring both sides of (1); $x^2−1=0$, obtained by subtracting $x^2$from both sides of (2); $(x−1)(x+1)=0$, obtained by factoring the left-hand side of$x^2−1$; $x=1$ or $x=−1$,which follows because $ab=0$ implies that $a=0$ or $b=0$
asked Apr 4, 2019 in Mathematical Logic Pooja Khatri 33 views
0 votes
0 answers
25
Kenneth Rosen Edition 7th Exercise 1.7 Question 30 (Page No. 91)
Show that these three statements are equivalent, where $a$ and $b$ are real numbers: $a$ is less than $b$, the average of $a$ and $b$ is greater than $a$, and the average of $a$ and $b$ is less than $b$.
Show that these three statements are equivalent, where $a$ and $b$ are real numbers: $a$ is less than $b$, the average of $a$ and $b$ is greater than $a$, and the average of $a$ and $b$ is less than $b$.
asked Apr 4, 2019 in Mathematical Logic Pooja Khatri 30 views
Page:
Dark theme
Muffin by Hélio Chun
Thanks to Q2A
...