Option A: ∃x(H(x)∧∀y(H(y)→x=y)
Could be rewritten as : - ∃x∀y(H(x)∧H(y)→x=y)
It forces us to take a single x from the domain and check for all y and if the condition is True we have exactly one person in the domain who is happy, hence True.
For two happy person or no happy person the condition would be False.
Another way to quickly get the intuition behind this option would be:-
P : ∃x(H(x)) tells us about atleast one happy person in the domain.
Q: ∀y(H(y)→x=y) tells us about atmost one happy person in the domain.
P∧Q = atleast one happy AND atmost one happy = exactly one happy person.
Option B: ∃x∃y(H(x)∧H(y)∧x!=y)
Even if we get a pair satisfying this condition it’s not guaranteed to be a True for exactly one person, hence False.
Option C: ∀x∀y(H(x)∧H(y)→x=y)
This option will be true even if we have no happy person in the domain, hence False.
Option D: ∃xH(x)∧∃yH(y)∧x!=y
Not even a preposition as it contains free variables (x and y) which are free to take any values from the domain, hence we can’t satisfy the condition.