60 60 votes Which one of the following is the most appropriate logical formula to represent the statement? "Gold and silver ornaments are precious". The following notations are used: $G(x): x$ is a gold ornament $S(x): x$ is a silver ornament $P(x): x$ is precious $\forall x(P(x) \implies (G(x) \wedge S(x)))$ $\forall x((G(x) \wedge S(x)) \implies P(x))$ $\exists x((G(x) \wedge S(x)) \implies P(x))$ $\forall x((G(x) \vee S(x)) \implies P(x))$ Mathematical Logic gatecse-2009 mathematical-logic easy first-order-logic + – gatecse 16.0k views answer comment Share Follow Print See all 14 Comments 14 14 Comments reply Show 11 previous comments Jeevan R commented Mar 22 reply Follow flag Note : X cannot be both gold and silver at same time X cannot be both lion and tiger at same time 1 1 replyShare legend_of_cse commented Jun 28 reply Follow flag Very easy and Explain every option Meaning https://gateoverflow.in/800/gate-cse-2009-question-23?show=537665#a537665 0 0 replyShare Strange commented Aug 23 reply Follow flag At Timestamp -> https://youtu.be/s41PLmHGf08?list=PLIPZ2_p3RNHidhFvyKH4U_VE1rFAyvG8U&t=2177 1 1 replyShare Please log in or register to add a comment.
Best answer 73 73 votes The statement could be translated as, if $x$ is either Gold or Silver, then it would be precious. Rather than, If $x$ is both Gold and Silver, as an item cannot both Gold and silver at the same time. Hence Ans is (D). sonapraneeth_a answered Jan 20, 2015 • edited Feb 17, 2021 by soujanyareddy13 sonapraneeth_a comment Share Follow See all 5 Comments 5 5 Comments reply Show 2 previous comments Verma Ashish commented Jan 11, 2019 reply Follow flag These logic are more confusing. Sometimes propositions doesn't convey any real meaning if we try to solve them according to simple english sentence then we might do it wrong. But here we have to use intuition.. / 5 5 replyShare pavansan commented Jan 4, 2025 reply Follow flag note:And will come when combination of both gives the result and Or will come when anyone enough gives the result 1 1 replyShare Ayon Chatterjee commented Jul 22, 2025 reply Follow flag This question try to confuse you with keyword "and" but keep in mind that two objects can't same. So a very beautiful question. 0 0 replyShare Please log in or register to add a comment.
13 13 votes By default when no quantifier words is present then it is assumed that it is “All” Option D is correct. Soumen Mondal 1 answered May 14, 2023 Soumen Mondal 1 comment Share Follow 0 reply Please log in or register to add a comment.
12 12 votes "Gold and silver ornaments are precious" For all x, x can be either Gold or Silver ornament then the x is precious. Lakshman Bhaiya answered Feb 19, 2018 Lakshman Bhaiya comment Share Follow 0 reply Please log in or register to add a comment.
6 6 votes Option D this is just Same as lion and tiger question https://gateoverflow.in/989/gate2006-26 Rishi yadav answered Aug 22, 2017 Rishi yadav comment Share Follow 0 reply Please log in or register to add a comment.
2 2 votes This statement can be expressed as => For all X, x can be either gold or silver then the ornament X is precious => For all X, (G(X) v S(x)) => P(X). Regina Phalange answered Apr 15, 2017 Regina Phalange comment Share Follow 0 reply Please log in or register to add a comment.
1 1 vote Option D First thing that we need to keep in mind is to decide the domain. Since, they did'nt specified what x is, we will take x as all ornaments in the universe. Second thing, Here in the question the word and is misleading & it does'nt mean that the ornament will be Gold & Silver. It can either be Gold or Silver. Third is correct choice of quantifier. if we use existential quantifier, it will mean that at least one Gold or Silver ornament is precious, which is not what the statement is saying. if the ornament is Gold or Silver then it will be precious.(all Gold or Silver ornament are precious). So we have to use universal quantifier. manikantsharma answered Sep 17, 2019 manikantsharma comment Share Follow 0 reply Please log in or register to add a comment.