530 views
2 votes
2 votes
In the $\textit{theory of inference},$ we begin with a set of formulas which we call $\textit{premises/ hypotheses}$ and using some rules we obtain some other $\textit{given formula}$ which we call the desired $\textit{conclusion}.$    
         
We say that $Q$ logically follows from $P$ if $P \rightarrow Q$ is a tautology or in other words:     
$\textit{Q logically follows from P if Q is tautologically implied by P}$    
      
($P$ stands for the conjunction of premises the and $Q$ stands for conclusion)     
Now, consider the following set of premises represented by English letters for various sentences.    
$1.$ $\neg S \rightarrow C$    
       
$2.$ $C \rightarrow \neg D$     
$3.$ $D \vee O$     
$4.$ $\neg O$      
Which of the following statement(s) is/are correct ?    
  1. Premise $(3)$ and Premise $(4)$ tautologically imply $D$   
  2. Premise $(2)$ and $D$ does not tautologically imply $\neg C$      
           
  3. Premise $(1)$ and $\neg C$ tautologically imply $S$ and $S$ is a logical consequence of given premises    
          
  4. Premise $(1)$ and $\neg C$ does not tautologically imply $S$

1 Answer

Best answer
1 votes
1 votes
  • D V O
  • O’

   $\therefore$ D                   a) is true

 

  • C → D’                                       
  • D                                                                       

   $\therefore$ C’                  b)is false 

                

  • S’→ C
  • C’

  $\therefore$ S                  c) is true           Conclusion is also called Consequence.

 

  • S’ → C
  • C’

 $\therefore$ S                  d) is false

On making a conclusion False, we can’t make all of the premises true.Therefore all are valid conclusion.

 

Ans:   A) and C)

(Using Law of Detachment, from $D \vee O \equiv \neg O \rightarrow D$ and $\neg O,$ we may infer $D.$

Similarly, From $C \rightarrow \neg D \equiv D \rightarrow \neg C$ and $D,$ we may infer $\neg C$ and

From $\neg S \rightarrow C \equiv \neg C \rightarrow S$ and $\neg C,$ we may infer $S.$)

edited by
Answer:

Related questions

328
views
1 answers
0 votes
ankitgupta.1729 asked Apr 15, 2023
328 views
Suppose two premises are given as:   $(1)$ Either Mary gives Peter his toy or Peter is going to cry.     $(2)$ Mary does not give Peter his ... .       Conclusion 'Peter is not going to cry' logically follows from the above two premises.
725
views
2 answers
3 votes
ankitgupta.1729 asked Apr 15, 2023
725 views
 To decide an argument is $\textit{valid}$ with $n$ distinct premises as $P_1,P_2,...,P_n$ and conclusion $C$ ... we $\textit{can't}$ infer $R \rightarrow S$ from $P_1,P_2,...,P_n.$
1.1k
views
2 answers
1 votes
ankitgupta.1729 asked Apr 15, 2023
1,122 views
 Consider the following argument:     If either wages or prices are raised, there will be inflation. If there is inflation, then either Congress must ... is a tautology.             Validity of the given argument can't be determined.
454
views
1 answers
1 votes
ankitgupta.1729 asked Apr 15, 2023
454 views
 Consider the following argument:     Either logic is difficult, or not many students like it. If mathematics is easy, then logic is not difficult. ... is a tautology            Validity of the given argument can't be determined