In the $\textit{theory of inference},$ we begin with a set of formulas which we call $\textit{premises/ hypotheses}$ and using some rules we obtain some other $\textit{given formula}$ which we call the desired $\textit{conclusion}.$
We say that $Q$ logically follows from $P$ if $P \rightarrow Q$ is a tautology or in other words:
$\textit{Q logically follows from P if Q is tautologically implied by P}$
($P$ stands for the conjunction of premises the and $Q$ stands for conclusion)
Now, consider the following set of premises represented by English letters for various sentences.
$1.$ $\neg S \rightarrow C$
$2.$ $C \rightarrow \neg D$
$3.$ $D \vee O$
$4.$ $\neg O$
Which of the following statement(s) is/are correct ?
- Premise $(3)$ and Premise $(4)$ tautologically imply $D$
- Premise $(2)$ and $D$ does not tautologically imply $\neg C$
- Premise $(1)$ and $\neg C$ tautologically imply $S$ and $S$ is a logical consequence of given premises
- Premise $(1)$ and $\neg C$ does not tautologically imply $S$