• edited by
13,647 views
43 43 votes

A relation $R$ is defined on ordered pairs of integers as follows: $$(x,y)R(u,v) \text{ if } x<u \text{ and } y>v$$ Then $R$ is:

  1.    Neither a Partial Order nor an Equivalence Relation
  2.    A Partial Order but not a Total Order
  3.    A total Order
  4.    An Equivalence Relation

5 Answers

Best answer
52 52 votes
Answer is $(A)$. Because the relation is not reflexive which is a necessary condition for both partial order and equivalence relation..!!

PS: For a relation to be reflexive $R(a,a)$ must hold for all possible $a$.
• edited by
15 15 votes

Just take an eg. of 3 elements. Let set A={0,1,2}

Find out the relation set according to qs.

Relation R ={  ((0,1),(1,0))  ,   ((1,2),(2,1))   ,  ((0,1),(2,0))  ,   ((0,2),(1,0))  ,  ((0,2),(1,1))  ,   ((0,2),(2,1))  , ((1,2),(2,0))  , ((1,2),(2,1)) }

Check properties of relation R :

                                               1.Reflexive    =  NO

                                               2.Symmetric  = NO

                                               3.Transitivity  = YES

                                               4.Antisymmetric = Yes

  So according to properties of POR and Equivalence relation it is neither POR nor Equivalence relation.

The correct answer is (A) Neither a Partial Order nor an Equivalence Relation

13 13 votes

An equivalence relation on a set x is a subset of x*x, i.e., a collection R of ordered pairs of elements of x, satisfying certain properties. Write “x R y” to mean (x,y) is an element of R, and we say “x is related to y,” then the properties are
1. Reflexive: a R a for all a Є R,
2. Symmetric: a R b implies that b R a for all a,b Є R
3. Transitive: a R b and b R c imply a R c for all a,b,c Є R.

An partial order relation on a set x is a subset of x*x, i.e., a collection R of ordered pairs of elements of x, satisfying certain properties. Write “x R y” to mean (x,y) is an element of R, and we say “x is related to y,” then the properties are

1. Reflexive: a R a for all a Є R,
2. Anti-Symmetric: a R b and b R a implies that for all a,b Є R
3. Transitive: a R b and b R c imply a R c for all a,b,c Є R.

An total order relation a set x is a subset of x*x, i.e., a collection R of ordered pairs of elements of x, satisfying certain properties. Write “x R y” to mean (x,y) is an element of R, and we say “x is related to y,” then the properties are

1. Reflexive: a R a for all a Є R,
2. Anti-Symmetric: a R b and b R a implies that for all a,b Є R
3. Transitive: a R b and b R c imply a R c for all a,b,c Є R.
4. Comparability : either a R b or b R a for all a,b Є R.

As given in question, a relation R is defined on ordered pairs of integers as follows: (x,y) R(u,v) if x < u and y > v , reflexive property is not satisfied here , because there is > or < relationship between (x ,y) pair set and (u,v) pair set . Other way , if there would have been x <= u and y>= v (or x=u and y=v) kind of relation amongs elements of sets then reflexive property could have been satisfied. Since reflexive property in not satisfied here , so given realtion can not be equivalence ,partial order or total order relation.So ,Answer (A) is true

• edited by
5 5 votes
For a relation to be partial order or equivalence relation it must be reflexive.
i.e. (x,y) is some element of the set then (x,y)R(x,y), but this doesn't satisfy the given condition of x<x, y>y

Option A
0 0 votes

equivalence relation - a collection R of ordered pairs of elements of x, satisfying certain properties. Write “x R y” to mean (x,y) is an element of R, and we say “x is related to y,” then the properties are:

1. Reflexive: a R a for all a Є R,

2. Symmetric: a R b implies that b R a for all a,b Є R

3. Transitive: a R b and b R c imply a R c for all a,b,c Є R.

---------------------------------------------------------------

partial order-  a collection R of ordered pairs of elements of x, satisfying certain properties. Write “x R y” to mean (x,y) is an element of R, and we say “x is related to y,” then the properties are:

1. Reflexive: a R a for all a Є R,

2. Anti-Symmetric: a R b and b R a implies that for all a,b Є R

3. Transitive: a R b and b R c imply a R c for all a,b,c Є R.

--------------------------------------------------------------------

total order - a collection R of ordered pairs of elements of x, satisfying certain properties. Write “x R y” to mean (x,y) is an element of R, and we say “x is related to y,” then the properties are:

1. Reflexive: a R a for all a Є R,

2. Symmetric: a R b implies that b R a for all a,b Є R

3. Transitive: a R b and b R c imply a R c for all a,b,c Є R.

4. Comparability : either a R b or b R a for all a,b Є R.

 

so correct option is A
So R is not reflexive.
∴R is neither a partial order, nor an equivalent relation.

Answer:
Position:
Show:

Related questions

113 113 votes
12 answers 12 answers
21.4k
21.4k views
Rucha Shelke asked Sep 18, 2014
21,444 views
Let $S = \{1, 2, 3,\ldots, m\}, m >3.$ Let $X_1,\ldots,X_n$ be subsets of $S$ each of size $3.$ Define a function $f$ from $S$ to the set of natural numbers as, $f(i)$ is...
89 89 votes
10 answers 10 answers
21.6k
21.6k views
Rucha Shelke asked Sep 18, 2014
21,630 views
Given a set of elements $N = {1, 2, ..., n}$ and two arbitrary subsets $A⊆N$ and $B⊆N$, how many of the n! permutations $\pi$ from $N$ to $N$ satisfy $\min(\pi(A)) = \min...
31 31 votes
10 answers 10 answers
12.4k
12.4k views
Rucha Shelke asked Sep 17, 2014
12,362 views
Let $E, F$ and $G$ be finite sets. Let$X = (E ∩ F) - (F ∩ G)$ and$Y = (E - (E ∩ G)) - (E - F)$.Which one of the following is true?$X ⊂ Y$$X ⊃ Y$$X = Y$$X - Y ≠ \emptyset$...
55 55 votes
8 answers 8 answers
17.1k
17.1k views
Rucha Shelke asked Sep 16, 2014
17,051 views
The set $\{1,2,3,5,7,8,9\}$ under multiplication modulo $10$ is not a group. Given below are four possible reasons. Which one of them is false?It is not closed$2$ does no...