34 34 votes Let $S$ be a set of $n$ elements. The number of ordered pairs in the largest and the smallest equivalence relations on $S$ are: $n$ and $n$ $n^2$ and $n$ $n^2$ and $0$ $n$ and $1$ Set Theory & Algebra gatecse-2007 set-theory&algebra normal relations + – Kathleen 13.7k views answer comment Share Follow Print See all 2 Comments 2 2 Comments reply Chhotu commented Oct 3, 2017 reply Follow flag Refer --> https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/1081333/prove-that-the-empty-relation-is-transitive-symmetric-but-not-reflexive 1 1 replyShare Tushar Rana commented Jan 7, 2025 reply Follow flag S is a set of n elements. We are saying ordered pairs, means 2 elements of the set are forming something. Means it is something involving n elements first time, and n elements 2nd time so it is a cross product of elements of A with itself means any subset of this cross product is a binary relation of A with itself. Now, the very first and must necessity of an equivalence relation is the reflexive pairs. And since there are n elements there are n * 1 possibilities for reflexive pairs. Therefore n reflexive pairs are possible. But we can also see that including just only reflexive pairs give us an equivalence relation, as there is no space for transitivity and symmetrivity follows trivially. Therefore the smallest equivalence relation has n pairs. Now for the largest equivalence relation we must see that if we include all the n square pairs (here we are saying about one relation from the subset of n square relations like for example A:{1,2} total binary relations are 2 power 4 :16 relations but the largest relation is {(1,1),(1,2),(2,1)(2,2)}) we get an equivalence relation as 1. All reflexive pairs are present. 2. All symmetric pairs are present. 3. All transitivity followed. Hence largest equivalence relation has nnsquare ordered pairs. 1 1 replyShare Please log in or register to add a comment.
Best answer 47 47 votes Answer is B. Equivalence relation means it is reflexive, symmetric and transitive If a relation is reflexive then it must have all the pairs of diagonal elements and relation with only diagonal elements is also symmetric and transitive. Therefore smallest such relation is of size $n.$ With diagonal elements, we can include all the elements as well. Therefore largest equivalence relation is of size $n^2.$ jayendra answered Jan 2, 2015 • edited Jun 7, 2021 by Lakshman Bhaiya jayendra comment Share Follow See all 7 Comments 7 7 Comments reply Show 4 previous comments junaid ahmad commented Jul 9, 2017 reply Follow flag when we include all the element's of the sets(for making it largest set) then there would be no way it is not equivalence,because we include all the elements which is making our relation equivalence i.e reflexive symmetric and transitive. 5 5 replyShare bthebestSelf commented Dec 5, 2020 reply Follow flag @Arjun sir I have a doubt here. I have read that ordered pairs means : (a,b) where a != b So here ans should be : (n^2 - n) and (0) Please correct me 0 0 replyShare ankit3009 commented Oct 5, 2021 reply Follow flag No, it can be a=b, an ordered pair (a, b) is a pair of objects. The order in which the objects appear in the pair is significant: the ordered pair (a, b) is different from the ordered pair (b, a) unless a = b. Ref : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ordered_pair 1 1 replyShare Please log in or register to add a comment.
14 14 votes Smallest Equivalence relation on set S = ∆ ( Diagonal relation ) Number of elements in Diagonal relation = ∣S∣ = n So, cardinality of Smallest Equivalence relation on set S = n Note: Empty relation on Non-empty set will never be an equivalence relation because it does not satisfy the reflexive property.Whereas Empty relation on empty set will always be an equivalence relation. Largest Equivalence relation on set S = S ⨉ S = ∣ S ⨉ S ∣ = n^2 So, cardinality of Largest Equivalence relation on set S = n^2 The correct answer is, (B) n^2 and n Warrior answered Aug 6, 2017 • edited Aug 6, 2017 by Warrior Warrior comment Share Follow See all 3 Comments 3 3 Comments reply Swati Rauniyar commented Oct 26, 2017 reply Follow flag Please explain with example for largest equivalence relation. 0 0 replyShare Warrior commented Oct 26, 2017 reply Follow flag Let ,S= {a,b} S⨉S ={(a,a),(a,b),(b,a),(b,b)} Largest equivalence relation on S =S⨉S ={(a,a),(a,b),(b,a),(b,b)} because it follows all the three properties Reflaxive ,Symmetric and transitivity and it is the largest set . Smallest equivalence relation on S ={(a,a),(b,b)} and cardinality is 2. 8 8 replyShare sunita24 commented Jan 12, 2018 reply Follow flag thanx 4 explaining wid an e.g 0 0 replyShare Please log in or register to add a comment.
0 0 votes Let S be a set of n elements say (1, 2, 3,... n). Now the smallest equivalence relation on S must contain all the reflexive elements ((1, 1), (2, 2). (3, 3),..., (n, n)} and its cardinality is therefore n. The largest equivalence relation on S is Sx S, which has cardinality of nxn = r². The largest and smallest equivalence relations on S have cardinalities of n² and n respectively. akshay_123 answered Sep 2, 2023 akshay_123 comment Share Follow 0 reply Please log in or register to add a comment.
0 0 votes Atleast your relation should be reflexive for being an equivalence relation. so min= n and max = $n^2$ manas_pant answered Feb 17 manas_pant comment Share Follow 0 reply Please log in or register to add a comment.
0 0 votes Let S = {1, 2, 3}Smallest Equivalence Relation = {(1, 1), (2, 2), (3, 3)} => nLargest Equivalence Relation = {(1, 1), (1, 2), (1, 3), (2, 1), (2, 2), (2, 3), (3, 1), (3, 2), (3, 3)} => n² Therefore, Correct Option :- B amaanshaikh_27 answered Apr 22 amaanshaikh_27 comment Share Follow 0 reply Please log in or register to add a comment.