• edited by
20,723 views
51 51 votes

Let $R$ be a non-empty relation on a collection of sets defined by $_{A}R_ B$ if and only if $A \cap B = \phi$. Then, (pick the true statement)

  1. $A$ is reflexive and transitive

  2. $R$ is symmetric and not transitive

  3. $R$ is an equivalence relation

  4. $R$ is not reflexive and not symmetric

5 Answers

Best answer
66 66 votes
Let $A = \{1,2,3\}$ and $B = \{4,5\}$  and $C = \{1,6,7\}$

now $A\cap B = \emptyset$ and $B\cap C= \emptyset$ but $A\cap C\neq \emptyset$, so $R$ is not transitive.

$A\cap A = A$, so $R$ is not reflexive.

$A\cap B = B\cap A$, so $R$ is symmetric

So, $A$ is false as $R$ is not reflexive or transitive

$B$ is true.

$C$ is false because $R$ is not transitive or reflexive

$D$ is false because $R$ is symmetric
• edited by
3 3 votes

​​​​​​

Short trick

Empty set always symmetric relation

The correct option is B R is symmetric and not transitive
(i) Reflexive
A∩A=A≠ϕ
So; (A, A) doesn't belongs to relation R,
∴ Relation R is not reflexive.

(ii) Symmetric
If A∩B=ϕ then B∩A=ϕ is also true.
∴ Relation R is not Symmetric relation.

(iii) Transitive
If A∩B=ϕ and B∩C=ϕ, it need be true that A∩C=ϕ
For example:
A={1,2}, B={3,4}, C={1,5,6}
A∩B=ϕ and B∩C=ϕ but
A∩C={1}≠ϕ
∴ Relation R is not transitive relation.

0 0 votes
Answer: A

Let A = {1,2} and B = {3,4}.

Then R = {(1,3),(1,4),(2,3),(2,4)} which is not reflexive and not symmetric.
0 0 votes

Option B: $R$ is symmetric and not transitive


Note here, it’s written that the relation is on collection of sets, i.e. the relation is between sets not between elements of sets. So, (A,B) will be part of R iff A∩B = ∅.

So it cant be reflexive since A∩A != ∅

But it can be symmetric since A∩B = B∩A = ∅ (here A and B are disjoint sets, A={1,2} and B={3,4}

Also, its not sure that it will always be transitive, for eg. A={1,2}, B={3,4} and C={2,5}, here A∩B = ∅, B∩C = ∅ but A∩C != ∅

which makes R, symmetric but not reflexive or transitive.

–3 –3 votes
Answer:
Position:
Show:

Related questions

64 64 votes
6 answers 6 answers
12.4k
12.4k views
Kathleen asked Oct 9, 2014
12,391 views
Let $F$ be the collection of all functions $f: \{1, 2, 3\} \to \{1, 2, 3\}$. If $f$ and $g \in F$, define an equivalence relation $\sim$ by $f\sim g$ if and only if $f(3)...
62 62 votes
6 answers 6 answers
16.5k
16.5k views
Kathleen asked Oct 9, 2014
16,459 views
Which one of the following is false?The set of all bijective functions on a finite set forms a group under function compositionThe set $\{1, 2, \dots p-1\}$ forms a group...
56 56 votes
10 answers 10 answers
16.7k
16.7k views
Kathleen asked Oct 9, 2014
16,694 views
Let $R$ denote the set of real numbers. Let $f:R\times R \rightarrow R \times R$ be a bijective function defined by $f(x,y) = (x+y, x-y)$. The inverse function of $f$ is ...
31 31 votes
7 answers 7 answers
17.4k
17.4k views
Kathleen asked Oct 9, 2014
17,404 views
Let $X = \{2, 3, 6, 12, 24\}$, Let $\leq$ be the partial order defined by $X \leq Y$ if $x$ divides $y$. Number of edges in the Hasse diagram of $(X, \leq)$ is$3$$4$$9$No...