764 views
1 votes
1 votes

Not Valid does it mean not False ? also how to solve it ?

 

1 Answer

Best answer
1 votes
1 votes

Reference: http://cse.unl.edu/~choueiry/S06-235/files/PredicatesQuantifiers-HandoutNoNotes.pdf
I think i somewhat figured it out correct me if any mistakes please, i took P(x,y) as x loves y

Then the options cab be re-written as follwing

a) There exists some one who loves everyone
then
Everyone are loved by someone

b) There exists someone who loves everyone
then
Everyone is loved by someone

c) There exists someone who loves everyone
then
There exists someone who loves someone

d) There exists someone who loves everyone
then
Everyone loves someone


Out of all the above statement D seems wrong, let me know if you have a correct or better solution

selected by

Related questions

2 votes
2 votes
2 answers
2
kd..... asked Jul 12, 2018
559 views
I am unable to prove following equations without using truth table1) p - (q v r) = (p->q) V (p->r) 2) ~(p <- q) = p <- ~q
1 votes
1 votes
3 answers
4
Vicky rix asked Mar 7, 2017
918 views
Which of the following statements are ALWAYS TRUE ?A) ∀x [P(x)] - ∃x [P(x)]B) ∃x [P(x)] - ∀x [P(x)]C) Both A) and B) and so both are equivalent D) Neither A) no...