• closed by
789 views
0 0 votes
closed with the note: Doubt resolved. Chec

Consider the following statements:

$P_1$: Sachin Tendulkar gets out before the tea break only if Ishant Sharma comes out to bat.

$P_2$: Ishant Sharma won’t come out to bat, if Lasith Malinga is not called to bowl.

$P_3$: Sachin Tendulkar got out before the tea break.

Which of the following does not follow from $P_1, P_2, P_3?$

  1. Lasith Malinga is called to bowl
  2. Ishant Sharma come out to bat.
  3. Sachin Tendulkar got out after the tea break.
  4. None of these.

I am getting D.

And its Logic format will be $\{(S \rightarrow I) \wedge(I \rightarrow L) \wedge S\} \rightarrow X$

Keeping A, B, C option as X one by one, and all follows, thus option D is correct but given answer is C.

 

Position:
Show:

Related questions

4 4 votes
2 2 answers
422
422 views
GO Classes asked Jun 18, 2025
422 views
Which of the following expressions is a tautology?$(P \rightarrow Q) \vee(Q \rightarrow P)$ $(P \vee Q) \rightarrow(P \rightarrow Q)$ $((P \rightarrow Q) \wedge P) \right...
1 1 vote
1 answers 1 answer
857
857 views
5 5 votes
1 answers 1 answer
4.2k
4.2k views
hitendra singh asked Oct 22, 2018
4,240 views
State T/F:1- Every satisfiable is a contingency2- Every satisfiable is a Tautology.
0 0 votes
0 0 answers
769
769 views
mohit kumar 5 asked Dec 16, 2017
769 views
(∀x∀yP(x,y))→(∀x∀yP(y,x)) is tautology or not??